To do it the week before the vote - I don't think think it's patriotic.I am still admittedly confused as it was this investigation that led to the FIFA ethics probe, where it is likely that someone will be found to have done something unethical.
Why is it the BBC's fault they legitimately have found a story and are running with it? I would think that everyone would want to hear about vote fixing and collusion between national bodies of this type.
While England (note not the UK as the venues are for England only), has something to lose, I would imagine so to does Anson.
Take a look here, where in 1994 Alan Rothenberg landed a $3 million bonus for getting the 1994 World Cup in the black (way in the black actually). While admittedly this was an operation role it stands to reason there is a pay day here for some folks. Just take a look at some of the numbers ... and remember this was 16 years ago. Adjusting for inflation, that is about $4.3 million today. Not bad.
Any bets on what Anson is getting? I have no idea, but "for Queen and Country" does not pass the sniff test to me.
Either way, as I have stated before, I support the BBC role in this provided they portrait an accurate picture of what is going on.
If FIFA is petty enough to take out any bad press they get on England, shame on them.
No comments:
Post a Comment