There were some funny things in this article:
Fifa has recognised the shortcomings of the previous testing environment and, in a tender document circulated on April 20, stated: "The tests will be conducted in two phases at a football stadium selected by the respective technology providers, in consultation with Fifa."How were these tested previously? Not in a football stadium? The engineer in me is coming out and really wondering what happed here the first time around that somehow the testing would not be accurate?
This next line was hilarious.
To proceed to the second round, technologies must demonstrate a minimum of 90% accuracy in recognising whether both a static or a moving ball is across the line.90%. That's it !!??!!
Frankly, what a joke. While I don't have a hard number, anecdotally if referees had a 10% margin for error on this stuff they would get in deep, deep trouble.
That is an outrageous and unacceptable number! For all the whining that has been done about referees missing crucial goal line calls, and the solution ...
We will get it right 9 out of every 10 times at least ... please.
Give me a live referee 10 out of 10 times.